Re: [Harp-L] Crap Musicians
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Crap Musicians
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:09:35 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=G3GBWu7z1oEC6sw35Vl5YIrC7GfJSK6DFq+fn681qudHQwMfreNTegfzxfGxaygu; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Rick In Davis wrote:
<Part of being a good harp player, I believe, is being a good person. Some guys
<might make the 99.4 percentile on one measure, but not the other. Better to be
<a crap musician than a crap person.
I agree 100% with the last two sentences of this post, and disagree 100% with the first sentence.
I regret to say that being a good person has nothing to do with being a good harp player, or a good
musician or artist of any other kind. Plenty of great artists are awful people. Plenty of good people
are inferior artists.
It's wonderful to be both a good person and a good musician. Unfortunately, one does not
imply the other. It's a pretty strange world, and part of its strangeness is that talent is sometimes
conferred on people who are not at all nice.
Regards, Richard Hunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.