Re: [Harp-L] Re: Little Walter
- To: SONNYTONE@xxxxxxx, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Little Walter
- From: Rick In Davis <rickindavis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ll++pb0uWcNSDgALoRQDx94nB907JMazFkdvzAu6IFT30fU6bniCZlvbOT3eFaekPNRmCcyA2HPwXZC/MJRVjOlGAK8WlmyCh8D/klZKerKw+85f6eUCtljhGfezs3Iimyxlx/5IPw0IP4VAovHHqs1D3VUS8menKgEaps6aHc8= ;
- In-reply-to: <2ed.51171dd.31694816@aol.com>
I don't think there is any need for personal insults. I certainly have never claimed to be an elite harp player. But I enjoy it, and so do the people who come to our shows. 99.999 pecent of them could care less if I use a smelly old tube amp or a digital pedal board.
If LIttle Walter Jacobs had spent this much energy defending the past he might never have invented his new tone. I bet he'd now be moving the music forward, again...
SONNYTONE@xxxxxxx wrote:
I just listened to your stuff. It wouldn't make much difference what you went through. Skip is a great tech, known him a long time.
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.