[Harp-L] revised question....

To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Harp-L] revised question....
From: Guy Buxman <beabsurd@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:56:42 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZwkpV2bat8lmcs13tl21J8cnGZvq0ZHfHr4iBIhaRJ77tNfc4LB3kFPM72yt859q6aCQwVPahAG37gJpRtjzn9Ux3LY8rD6no3X2jfGQr0g3+QaN3sfeRYQEERHCa2icGSRsyfT9QM6t9RcCDkSBPsq0czEsyfvOwSl2OMWfrrs=

My very first posting on harp-l, and I botched it.  I meant to say minor
keyed harps, not flats.  My bad.
So...are minor keyed harps useful?

Many thanks,
Guy

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Harp-L] revised question....
  - From: Bob Cohen

Previous by Date: [Harp-L] Flat keyed harps...
Next by Date: [Harp-L] Re:Harpking
Previous by Thread: [Harp-L] Renaissance, Seydel etc..
Next by Thread: RE: [Harp-L] revised question....
Harp-L November 2005 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Harp-L list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Harp-L mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.