"Steve Shaw" <moorcot@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think the XB40 falls down quite badly in the areas Tony was talking about.
> They are loud...but that's about it. They have a strangely dry tone
> (though whether listeners would pick up on that is another matter), but they
> certainly don't respond to light pressure and the reeds respond quite
> sluggishly. After a few minutes' practice with one of these I feel I've
> increased my lung capacity by about a litre, and If I then pick up a SP20
> I'm in danger of blasting the reeds to kingdom come.
With all due respect, I disagree. I find the XB-40 to be an ideal choice for a live bluegrass setting that includes the harmonica. First of all, standard bluegrass instrumentation of fiddle, banjo, mandolin, guitar and upright bass is LOUD! I don't care how well one can project a harmonica, a standard diatonic has difficulty cutting through. Banjos can't be played soft. Fidlles have difficulty with that as well but more importantly their tambre is very similar to a harmonica and the harp gets drowned out.
I find the XB-40 to be very responsive. There was a learning curve initially but I learned I didn't have to play or bend as hard to get the note I wanted. I find it can be played with a very light touch and still get plenty of volume.
and place but are NOT a replacement for a standard diatonic.
BTW, while many of the fiddle tunes are in the major scale and1st position, fiddle tunes are modal and there are lots and lots and lots of 'em that utilize 2nd and 3rd and positions in between all three.
When I want to just pick up a harp and play I never reach for the XB-40 unless I'm working on something specific.
http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/trad_irish_harmonica HEAR my CD clips: http://www.gjk2.com/steveshaw/cd.htm READ review of my CD: http://www.irishmusicreview.com/sshaw.htm