Re: [Harp-L] re:volume control corrected



Oops, I kept referring to "Greg" as "Gary" in my response below. Sorry folks, but that's what happens when I type emails at work with someone named Gary talking to me at the same time. Can you believe the audacity of someone wanting to talk to me about work related issues while I'm doing Harp-L stuff in my office? What's next? Expecting me to actually do work? Sheesh!


-------------- Original message from nonidesign@xxxxxxx: -------------- 


> They're a lot cheaper than an original Switchcraft in-line vol control....if you 
> can even find one. 
> If you buy one of Gary's units you can use it on any/all mics you want. It is a 
> sturdy unit and compact. 
> I have one that I use for a biscuit mic (a feedback monster, by the way) and it 
> is great. 
> 
> I hate anything hanging off my belt like cel phone, keys, etc. I have a volume 
> control unit that clips onto my belt and I never use for that reason ( and also 
> because I like having the volume control by the mic). The belt clip unit cost 
> $50.00. Gary's in-line vol control was around the same price and I am very happy 
> with it. 
> 
> 
> -------------- Original message from Greg Heumann : 
> -------------- 
> 
> 
> > Cletus wrote: 
> > 
> > Subject: [Harp-L] Re:volume control product offering 
> > > 
> > > too expensive in my opinion 
> > > 
> > > if it were half the price i'd probably order several, and i don't 
> > > imagine i'm alone in that appraisal 
> > > 
> > > cletus 
> > 
> > I make the control, so I'll tell you why it costs what it does. If 
> > there were a market for 100,000 units or more, I could probably have it 
> > made in Taiwan very cheaply. This would require however a large upfront 
> > investment - say, $50,000 or more, which would have to be amortized 
> > across the units sold. But the market isn't that big. In fact, it is 
> > downright tiny. So these units have to be built by hand, by me. They 
> > are very labor intensive. 
> > 
> > 1) There is precision machining (tolerances have to be maintained 
> > within .001 for a good, strong press fit between the end caps and the 
> > barrel.) Again, due to low volume, it doesn't pay to do this with CNC 
> > machines, which wold make sense if they were to be made in the 1000's. 
> > CNC set-up costs need to be amortized across large numbers of units. So 
> > - they are done by hand. Not cheap. 
> > 
> > 2) Search all you want, you'll find there is no such thing as the 
> > female version of the 2501MP panel mount connector. You can't just 
> > screw a ring on a 2501MP - it won't "float" above the threads. So I 
> > have to machine each 2501MP for this purpose. You'll also note you 
> > can't buy the retaining rings separately - I have to buy ungodly 
> > quantities at a time to get them at all. 
> > 
> > 3) That is a 3/4" barrel. The pot has to be inserted and maneuvered so 
> > that the shaft comes up through the hole. The shaft on those pots is 
> > too long to fit inside the barrel, so I have to cut every shaft down. I 
> > could build them with bigger barrels, and in fact I have- but they're 
> > UGLY, and they won't allow a stick mic like a Shure 533 to be placed 
> > in a mic holder. 
> > 
> > 4) Every pot has to have 3 wires cut, stripped at each end and tinned. 
> > Then they must be soldered to the pot, shrink wrap cut and installed, 
> > shrunk, and the other ends soldered to the connectors. 
> > 
> > 5) The connectors have to be press fit into the ends, secured with nuts 
> > and loctite. Then the ends have to be pressed into the barrel, again 
> > secured with loctite. 
> > 
> > I could go on, but hopefully you get the idea. I am very proud of the 
> > product, which I think is functional, aesthetically pleasing and of 
> > very high quality. Of course, each one has to be tested, marketed, 
> > packaged and shipped. And distributors need a piece of the pie. If it 
> > is too expensive for you I understand - and respect your opinion. I 
> > just wanted to explain why a product like this doesn't follow the same 
> > laws of economics as something mass produced in a factory. 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org 
> > Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx 
> > http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org 
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx 
> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l 



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.