[Harp-L] Re:"That's All"
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re:"That's All"
- From: "jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dmf273@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wSC/BuHOEZwNvbgbFCcFgp1ZcMRlJYAXDbhdMg+xSghaAc9Ps9E6vOdneZkVogJpeOASI3vlOzV3xV1RZq4F1Dlh7nSWOmKRubVC7qyahIm3esyxT3PQPxDZyxbbfP3/RxQQts0cDtAXtndXUMbKvQWEpL+HOMS3K5SHal7iOMM= ;
- In-reply-to: <200507271635.j6RGYgsP010191@harp-l.org>
- Reply-to: jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No I didn't use any pitch correction. I wanted the sound to remain as organic as possible. The
TC-Helion software I use is included with Band-in-a-Box 2005 and is relatively inexpensive
compared to their dedicated rack units. Band-in-a-Box had a rudimentary version of TC-Helion in
their 2004 release, but the latest 2005 version is the one you want. It gives you much more
control over the individual voices, as you noticed.
>jazmaan wrote:
>> Dang Tim! You want me to spill all my secrets? Well ok, I guess
>> that's what Harp-L is for!
>I asked because I noticed that in some areas the harmonies were
>shifting when there was no change in the input note. This implies
>more control than simply the "real time" generation of a harmony
>note based on the input signal.
>Some of the TC-Helicon devices are significantly more sophisticated
>(and expensive) than my Digitech Vocalist VR, and I'm curious to
>know which one you're using. I know that, for example, the
>VoiceWorks device has the ability to do pitch correction on the
>source signal, and I'm wondering if you've tried that with your
>recording. Seems like it would be one way to guarantee that those
>bends are spot-on!
>Maybe I need to spend more time with the MIDI capabilities of my
>VR!
>-tim
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.