Re: Re: [Harp-L] re: reverb and delay
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: [Harp-L] re: reverb and delay
- From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:15:13 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=lC7hee3TyH4Uv0mmDkUddF2pXGjE89sEPNfC3KfX5ge1Nc0gBeoN3r9YftKU+LHU5Q4Rz7VLOBitMeL2RxKTJQHJkAgJn2OeSRTMojA5ZrXpNShyhkhIjHNc+NRMx6V3;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
The Midiverb IV that I own is 18-bit, but I still think it sounds
great, and is very easy to adjust the settings. Most of the presets
are way over the top -- they're intended for studio work where you can
dial the "wetness" -- but with a little tweaking you can make them
stage-ready in some of the 127 user-program areas.
-tim
fjm wrote:
> I'll second Tim's reccomendation of the Midiverb. I mostly use mine
> for delay and I like it just fine. It's extremely rugged and readily
> available used. I think they're 24 bit so for a digital effect they
> sound way better than average. I own an Echoplex, it's very nice and
> sounds great but it's not nearly as versatile as the Alesis and it
> costs too much to buy and it breaks and I was always buying it tapes
> when I used if more often. fjm
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.