Re: [Harp-L] RE: delay v reverb
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] RE: delay v reverb
- From: Tim Cass <tim.cass@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:52:31 +0100
- Cc: havaball@xxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=d6RspdjnZArT62TghhOpNdF5M40t0u/vYq8yPw8UrecL/CWJh/T0vXaIHp2+cvzaNUDqKxLDpn0mGbXX+XLV7GgQvnJOxYUB9JTGyf37tx+705GTqnQu9mKGjdiz4GB8zgwOBFHmsnsZ90UTTaUFknyd/HFICiJSCpwiCMh5bZg=
- In-reply-to: <f05100302bf0895a9ca3d@68.227.83.182>
- References: <f05100302bf0895a9ca3d@68.227.83.182>
- Reply-to: Tim Cass <tim.cass@xxxxxxxxx>
TB said:
> Having said that, though, I still prefer reverb to any delay I've
> heard. <shrug> Still I'll keep my ears open for the DM-2; maybe I'll
> change my mind?
------
Tom, I am looking forward to seeing you in a couple of weeks or so at
the E.B.A Blues week in Northampton, I have a DM-2 that I will brring
along and your welcome to give it a try.
regards
Tim
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.