RE: [Harp-L] RE: delay v reverb

["Chris Michalek" <Chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think of it this way...  Reverb sweetens the tone but a slight
slapback delay (analogue) thickens it.  For acoustic harp I want the
sweet reverb but for the electric stuff I want thick and nasty!




>
>
>
>---- Original Message ----
>From: havaball@xxxxxxx
>To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Harp-L] RE: delay v reverb
>Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:04:47 -0700
>
>>
>>Chris writes:
>>One or two people mentioned digital delay pedals but most of the
>talk
>>was about the Dm-2.
>>
>>The Boss DM-2 is an analogue delay pedal.  Many consider this pedal
>>to be the holy grail of delays.
>>_________
>>
>>Aha -- thanks for the clarification, Chris.  I'm not familiar with 
>>this unit so I shall withold judgement, however logic would indeed 
>>suggest to me that an analogue delay would be warmer than digital. 
>>And given a choice I'm an analogue kind of guy. (Our new CD was an 
>>all analogue recording.)
>>
>>Having said that, though, I still prefer reverb to any delay I've 
>>heard. <shrug>  Still I'll keep my ears open for the DM-2; maybe
>I'll 
>>change my mind? <g>
>>
>>-TB
>>_______________________________________________
>>Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
>>Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
>>http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>>

Chris Michalek

www.michalekstrone.com
CD Available
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/michalekstrone