[Harp-L] Re: reverb v. delay
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: reverb v. delay
- From: tom ball <havaball@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:32:51 -0700
- In-reply-to: <200507232222.j6NMMGtl027132@harp-l.org>
- References: <200507232222.j6NMMGtl027132@harp-l.org>
Obviously everyone has their own opinions on this matter, but I'm
rather surprised to see that more folks here on the L seem to prefer
digital delay to 'verb. Maybe I'm just a dinosaur, but personally I
have never heard any sort of digital delay that didn't sound
electronic, artificial, cheesy or tinny. Granted, I'm also no fan of
chorus, flange or other digital effects -- too sanitized and
formulaic for my tastes.
On the other hand I wouldn't be caught dead playing (or singing)
without some sort of reverb -- ideally plate 'verb but I'll settle
for a Fender outboard tank. Even in live 'acoustic' settings (albeit
with mics,) I find a touch of reverb to be downright essential for
both vocal and harp.
All just my humble opinion of course -- your mileage may vary.
cheers from a curmudgeonly reverb fanatic,
Tom Ball
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.