[Harp-L] Re: XB-40
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: XB-40
- From: "jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dmf273@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZVVCY/0hk+t2bYGzwapXWURDo+i8XSnUWzmH5tBAkidGwU/e5QR+E7WjdMdLfnJz9qZLhNsS1k39M2cY/2lUpCMbUGA74rqNbIKQY64TnjDIksgQbPvTMDpC617ZsnBh/i7/WsKqlQCaOWSboUpWvxBCHHGPhiSYW3Gb9Lm6rCE= ;
- In-reply-to: <200507052033.j65KWh4A012497@harp-l.org>
- Reply-to: jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So the list consensus seems to be that nobody (but me) likes the XB-40. I wonder how long Hohner
will continue to make them if the list is any indication of the general buying public?
Steve mentioned that he owns a Low D and a G, but only plays the G. I bought a low Eb which had
erratic low end draw bends. You couldn't make the same low end draw bends as on a regular low Eb
harp. Pat Missin tried to fix it without much success. I'm wondering whether anyone else has
had similar issues with low XBs?
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.