[Harp-L] Shaker Madcat?
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Shaker Madcat?
- From: Vergil Mueller <vcm2@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:30:09 -0800
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
Some friends and I recently started a rock/funk band and I am getting
ready to buy my first mic. I am considering the Shaker Madcat for a
couple of reasons, but I had some questions about how people feel about
it. I realize that taste in mics is a very personalized question, but
since I know very little about mics, I thought I would open it up to
some feedback from mic veterans (no pun intended).
Here are my questions/comments on what I have read about the Shaker
Madcat so far:
1) The manufacturer's description says it is small enough and shaped so
that you can do the natural "wah-wah" effect with your hands, and the
mic will pick it up. Is this true? How effectively does it reproduce
the traditional acoustic wah sound, or is it a different sound?
2) Since I'll be playing several different styles of music and might
need to sound "clean" from time to time, I am looking for a mic that has
a good range of different sounds or styles. I have heard that the
Madcat has a somewhat "clean" sound naturally because of its relatively
weak signal, but that you can also get the "thick, hot" sound with it if
you use a preamp and/or have the volume controls set right. How
accurate is this claim? What configurations (pre-amps, amps, settings)
have been used to get a good, thick blues sound?
If anyone has any general recommendations about why or why not the
Madcat is a good mic, let 'er rip. Also, are there any other mic
recommendations for a guy who plays a good bit of non-blues as well as
blues?
Thanks,
Vergil
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.