Fwd: [Harp-L] Why is a harmonica called a harp?

--- In harp-l-archives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "ZAIS Elliot" 
<ZAIS.Elliot@xxxx> wrote:
I'm sure there is some interesting history which answers Elizabeth's
question of Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:59:51 EST Harp-L Digest, Vol 17, Issue
16.  However, it doesn't justify replacing the perfectly good name of
our instrument, the harmonica or mouth organ with the perfectly good
name of another, radically different, instrument, the harp. 

===========Winslow says:

Your argument is based on a mistaken premise. 

The name "harp" is not a replacement for "harmonica."

The instrument was called a harp before it was called a harmonica.

And harmonica was already the name of another instrument.

The first harmonicas were called Aeolina - which refers to a harp 
whose strings are excited to sound by wind. Here the reeds replace 
strings. Other early harmonicas were called "mundharfe" - mouth-harp. 
I'm not sure when the harmonica name was first borrowed to refer to 
our instrument.

Meanwhile, the name "harmonica" referred to at least one other 
instrument, the most recent of which was the glass harmonica, which 
operated by the friction of the fingers against wet glass. Benjamin 
Franklin is said to have invented a form of this instrument that 
resembeled a treadle-oerated lathe, with several glass discs of 
different sizes (and pitches) rotating in a trought of water.

Mouth organ is perhaps the most technically accurate, as free reeds 
are also used in organs and harmoniums. But isn't that term better 
suited to the melodica which also has a piano-style keyboard in 
addition to reeds and breath activation?

(Perhaps calling it a harmonica was suggested by the harmonium - 
purely a speculation that just occurred to me.)


Appeals to "tradition", i.e., we've called it a harp for too long to 
change, seem to be rather weak arguments.  Granted, harmonica is a 
long word at four syllables.  


Like it or not, all three names (of one, three, and four syllables)
are here to stay, and no argument is likely to dislodge any of them.


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.