[Harp-L] SJ410 & thunderharp
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] SJ410 & thunderharp
- From: john kuzloski <jkuzloski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:09:48 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=L2yL1ZinrvtdUwRv+lbEOeLPdE+co9MlAn3StUtSGlU7hm1Bg29dZ+bcMnIZd2L5r5Khbb41VLXkOhYx4j5o0T5+idwIapoClzki9J4/KGn+vYa0DegSobLwH/fWCYqhK1dxlEXH8+EcfTRooAms8xFjWXkBcNH98kptpvD7OjY= ;
Since the subject of Sonny Jr and the subject of the thunderharp microphone (Steve) have both just come up, I thought I would chime in to say that the combination of an SJ410 and a thunderharp microphone truly does have a remarkable, thunderous bottom end. (And they've both been great to deal with, BTW.)
For full disclosure, I have to add that, at the moment, I wouldn't play a gig exclusively with that combination -- I don't always want that sound. Again, to be fair, I haven't worked with that amp/mike ombination long enough to see if changing the EQ would make that combiation more versitile. (It's hard for me drift too far right now from the 410/545 combination that just cuts through the mix like crazy).
The main point of this post was to say how darn thunderous the 410/thunder combination can be! (and to appreciate the work and commitment of the builders!).
--john k.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.