[Harp-L] Butter's "missing" Work Song note (was cannonball adderly)
- To: John Kerkhoven <solo_danswer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Butter's "missing" Work Song note (was cannonball adderly)
- From: Mojo Red <harplicks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:26:08 -0800 (PST)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=lD7uM1cmbfxAnTiNjnhe2X4+AKVdd3CJbUIBJ5bfXgcua97uNy9sGWtllFjjmwB1GQbYPwJveaLjZM6HzQGBFUj8uVIAMcCb6Fac1nlCiGD2626Q+WbVPLeU6jTec7a5J7hWHZK5LexCjzUfZ+SBXpTxCXfG6wzGvJQWvCWjCKM= ;
- In-reply-to: <001d01c60047$1ff02e30$7f836395@win2k>
Hi John,
I've attempted to play the Work Song on short harp
and I think the missing note would require a 7
overdraw to "get it right." Least ways, when I play
it in 3rd position, that's the case. Did Butter do
it in 3rd? If so, that's likely the cause of the
stir. It is certainly the reason I mainly cover it
with a button harp.
Here's some make-shift tab for the Work Song in 3rd
on short harp.
4 4 5 6+ 6 6 6+ 6 7+
4 4 5 6+ 5 4 4 4+ 4
4 4 5 6+ 6 6 6+ 6 7+
6 6 6 7+ 6 7+OD 6
8 6 7+ 6 6+ 6 5 5 4 4+ 4 4+
4 4 5 6+ 6' 6+ 5 6+ 5 4
4+ 4 6+ 6
4 4 6 6+
6 6+ 5 6+ 5 4 4+ 4
I'm thinking that pesky 7OD is the note that Butter
avoided, as did William Clarke when he covered it
(even though he did it using a chromatic).
Hope this helps. Not totally sure whether I'm right
though as I don't have Butter's version on hand to
verify.
Harpin' in Colorado,
--Ken M.
--- John Kerkhoven <solo_danswer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> The recent discussion about Butterfield included
> a post by fjm in regards to
> "work song" and butterfield missing a note. i
> have loved the butterfield
> since i first heard it, so i was wondering,
> "what's wrong with the way Paul
> plays?"
>
> I resisted posting this question until i dug up
> the original -- or at least
> Cannonball Adderly's version, as the song is
> credited to "Nat" Adderly, not
> Julian "Cannonball" Adderly.
>
> And as that tidbit of information suggests, I
> have dug up Adderly's version.
> And then a friend lent me another Adderly disk.
>
> Holy Smokes! I chastised my friend for not
> lending me Adderly sooner.
>
> The two disks I have listened to are "Cannonball
> in Europe" and "Cannonball
> Adderly: The Capitol Years". There's a grooving
> Pop Staples song on "The
> Capitol Years" called "Why Am I Treated So Bad".
> "Walk Tall" is another
> treat. Both these albums are great from beginning
> to end.
>
> And yes, Butterfield's phrasing on "Work Song" is
> not the same as Adderly's.
>
> If you say "So What?" I suggest you listen to
> Adderly's version. If you have
> listened to Adderly's version and still say "So
> What?" then we are at a
> crossroads.
>
> All the same, god bless Butterfield.
>
> John
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.