Re: [Harp-L] Re:Butter, soul, & overblows
On Dec 6, 2005, at 8:05 PM, Roscoharp@xxxxxxx wrote:
Hey list (& Mike),
What has overblowing got to do with this discussion?? Did I miss
something?
I get the digest version, so maybe I did overlook something.
Hi Rosco,
chris michalek said, "Frankly I don't understand why people hold
Butterfield in such high esteem.
Rob P. and other gave the reason why and mentioned Butterfield was an
influence of Howard's,
who Chris holds in high regard. Butter was also an influence on
Jason Ricci who Chris holds in high regard.
My comment about overblowers was a knee jerk reaction to something
that has been bugging me for awhile.
So anyway, here are a couple rants:
I hear lots of horn players with what I think of as 'no soul',
lots of
pianists with 'no soul', lots of guitar players, drummers,
chromatic players, &
yes, lots of blue harpists with 'no soul', & never an overblow is
heard.
Conversely, I hear some so called "overblow players" who have
buckets of soul. At
least in my opinion. And it is all only opinion. Playing overblows
doesn't
add or subtract soul. I would be hard pressed to come up with a "
lot of
overblow players that learn Howard's technique but have zilch
for soul" as Mike
writes. For that matter, I would have a hard time coming up with
"a lot" of
'overblow players', period. (I'm not sure there are thirty people
using
overblows regularly & with facility in their music. I might be
way off.)
BTW, Good luck trying to define 'soul.' Your 'soul' is surely
different
than mine.
Soul, as I would define it is a proper balance of technique and feel
within the groove of the beat to create harmony within the song.
Too often that balance is offset with more technique then feel. Just
because someone can play more
notes doesn't mean they always should. I'm not referring to playing
fast or complicated, but rather playing busy.
Jason proves you can play fast and have something to say.
Another thing, someone who uses overblows is just a player with a
technique
that gets a few extra notes out of the instrument. Some of these
folks are
inluenced by Howard, many aren't. I love listening to him, but I
don't hear much
influence in my own playing. I've grown to dislike the
identifying term
'overblow player'.....like overblows are the goal of the music, or
there is a
monolithic movement to stamp out traditional blues harp or something.
It's not the extra notes but how they are used. There is a saying in
photography, "color for colors sake".
It refers to students use the use of color to create an emotion
rather then using all the elements or color, light and composition
to create a "feel" for the image. I think that occurs when some
players discover how to play the extra notes.
There are a lot of technically proficient musicians in music in
general that get lost in technique and take a "hey look at what I can
do" approach to playing.
It can be interesting to hear on the short term but getting boring
real quick.
Butter was a very early influence on me. Like, years before I
even took up
harp seriously. I sort of don't care if someone else doesn't get
it, or
hasn't gotten it yet.
The problem with having mentors is we sometimes hear the technique
without hearing the underlying expression of the music.
That comes with musical maturity and that is what separates the
clones and their ego from those that develop maturity and awareness
in their playing.
mike
Later,
Rosco
_may.be au.gust_ (http://www.maybeaugust.com/)
download or stream live recordings: _may.be au.gust_
(http://www.maybeaugust.com/Live.aspx)
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.