Re: [Harp-L] re: jazz on a diatonic
- To: harp-l harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] re: jazz on a diatonic
- From: Jp Pagan <jpl_pagan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:14:20 -0800 (PST)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=swMLzlc4nkjkgAOaMxu6GgtprKE8ZbwAlT26h5xNnSdXHFhpPMUsWaCwPXhmIMg3pJBPqOwatNHCEVYZC5zy9qf4bO+ZDM/rATemWd064rHbBXoaYgNDT66E6GJGuwn3YFQtDiQ2kaKBOWhCW7OMaYV2YI2BQqFXhzYbCL2CdCI= ;
--- In harp-l-archives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fjm
<mktspot@xxxx> wrote:
>
> rainbow jimmy writes:
>
> > Butterfield had a viable approach to jazz on the
> > diatonic--without overblows or specially tuned
harps. Ditto Work Song.
>
> There are problems with Work Song as done by
Butterfield, specifically
> that glaringly wrong note at the end of the intro.
what's wrong with changing that note, exactly? is it
just that it isn't exactly the same? i actually like
that change, for one, and while trying to learn to
play the tune, sometimes i play it one way sometimes
another. i'd call Butter's slightly "bluesier" for
lack of a better term, but no valid, imo. i'm curious
to know more about yours.
--Jp
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.