[Harp-L] XB-40 set up
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] XB-40 set up
- From: Zombor Kovacs <zrkovacs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 05:04:52 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sHMU0K1/hXMSdreXtAleJnv2at8xIAu8UjVDlYxsbjAfYua0D1YyduJjaJmpK/L1IXvWdKCnFtmrrJYcx4TocnxH9NUMLlKybTuJJpXTW+UX9iCg6/Rlii/zu7R8muLEBrQs4nQ0pEmDvsg5nE15sLFlAAMGQXHY6MscEiMdWbM= ;
- In-reply-to: <1aa.43b5cab4.30c3f69f@aol.com>
Okay, I got my XB40 set up more or less. Now it is
much better than it was, but it is not possible to
eliminate high pitched interference whistles 100% in
the upper end. Hole nr 10 blow is still problematic
and bending is uncontrollable. Any hints on this are
most welcome.
I still think that the harp is not fine enough. It
requires more effort to control bending than on a
standard diatonic. My theory regarding this is the way
air has to twist its way through to the reeds. It has
to turn up (or down) pass a valve, then turn to the
left (or right) and exit through the reed. The airflow
is absolutely not simmetric and not optimal. Also
while on a standard diatonic the opposing upper and
lower reeds might effect each others vibrations since
they are vibrating one above the other (perhaps there
is a coupled vibration) here since the interacting
reeds are next to each other it cannot be the same at
all. Anyhow it is, the feeling I get is that the
bending response and control is significantly poorer
than on a standard harp.
So any hints on how to set up hole nr 10 blow is most
appreciated.
thanks
Zombor
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.