[Harp-L] Popper
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Popper
- From: "jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dmf273@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zr5T5hdbvYyGrcsBymyiI/J7ZRVF6ZubkOnnKd6kOWnbmIXLP06Zy3S1tqXj8yudZs4sNKtfNTr/uD3s6oS7XJWNklGIE1sSRyUg+uC8mwCb6KJ2t1sX8sq7Rcow6EgW9osgJ0n3XJxG5hUjL02m3Ikhn3cNzn8F8vOkqwvMMzc= ;
- In-reply-to: <200508111822.j7BIM1fg013817@harp-l.org>
- Reply-to: jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Why are we engaging in the umpteenth discussion of Popper? Popper bashing doesn't help anyone
here become a better player does it? If someone offered up a tabbed out Popper lick, I'd try and
learn it. If someone criticized the lick and showed how it might have been played better, I'd
study that analysis too. But "Popper is fast" "No he isn't" doesn't really help anyone does it?
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.