Re: [Harp-L] Clarification



Mike:

Welcome to Harp-L

Your post shows that you're a class act. Don't sweat it. You were being honest, and you have every right to say how something sounded to you. Folks on this list do so all the time, about amps, harps, players (well, most players are treated nicely with a couple of exceptions--and even those folks have _some_ supporters).

You wanna see some folks cringe? I play through an amp modelling digital multi-effects processor (straight to the board), and I'm seriously thinking of a modelling multi-effects amp or marrying my present processor with a keyboard amp. I play through those types of set-ups because I like 'em. I like my sound through 'em, and I like _me_ through 'em. :-)

Ron



Bluesreedmc@xxxxxxx wrote:

A few days ago I posted my opinion about the Meteor. That I thought It sounded "thin and didn't project well" By the way, this was my first post and now regret it. My intention was not to cause irritation. <snipped>






This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.