Re: [Harp-L] Clarification
Mike:
Welcome to Harp-L
Your post shows that you're a class act. Don't sweat it. You were being
honest, and you have every right to say how something sounded to you.
Folks on this list do so all the time, about amps, harps, players (well,
most players are treated nicely with a couple of exceptions--and even
those folks have _some_ supporters).
You wanna see some folks cringe? I play through an amp modelling digital
multi-effects processor (straight to the board), and I'm seriously
thinking of a modelling multi-effects amp or marrying my present
processor with a keyboard amp. I play through those types of set-ups
because I like 'em. I like my sound through 'em, and I like _me_ through
'em. :-)
Ron
Bluesreedmc@xxxxxxx wrote:
A few days ago I posted my opinion about the Meteor. That I thought It
sounded "thin and didn't project well" By the way, this was my first post and now
regret it. My intention was not to cause irritation. <snipped>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.