Douglas Tate wrote: > This is strange... for once I have to disagree with Tim... not in > what he says but in what he implies.
I'm sorry, I didn not mean to imply (although clearly I did) that customized harmonicas were suitable only for those who wished to perform at a level beyond the way the instrument designed to be played. In fact, I built a business by providing a better out-of- the-box experience for players who were just tired of disappointing or inconsistent stock diatonic harmonicas.
I would argue that the process of "customisation" (whether spelt with an 's' or a 'z') involves tailoring the instrument to the players needs.
In some cases the player is capable of describing those needs in detail, in many other cases the player's needs must be inferred from listening to what they expect from their instrument.
Not taking the player's needs into consideration is
certainly modification and perhaps improvement of the instrument, but not customization.
Customization for some players needs can include improvements to the instrument which make certain advanced techniques possible.
> However, the well set up harp... can one REALLY argue against this > being something to aim to have??
Certainly not me!