RE: Self-Appointed Censors
 
- Subject: RE: Self-Appointed Censors
 
- From: Aeskow@xxxxxxx
 
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:32:46 EST
 
It's ok. Let's stop this fight. The tale had little harp content, but it was 
just that, a short story. Let's go back to harp-l. Thanks 
Fernando Toral 
Wow!  Another guy who's elected himself Final Arbiter of "Harp Content" and 
Supreme Definer of Exactly What Harp-L Should Be!
It would be great to "stop it," of course--it's annoying, and I have a 
sound-check to go to, as no doubt many of the people on this list do--but the more 
you try to demand that others conform to your narrow definitions, the more 
important the "fight" becomes.  And besides, for some of us, the "harp content" in 
Muddy's review of Butterfield is, uh...enormous.  And provides a wonderful 
standard to judge our own performance by.
Peace Out
Johnny T
     
     This archive was generated by a fusion of 
     Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and 
     MHonArc 2.6.8.