AW: SM 58 Question
- Subject: AW: SM 58 Question
- From: "\"busy\" Tom Deimbacher" <bluesmaster@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 02:10:23 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
I am a soundengineer and harp-player..,so i know both sides...stay with =
teh
SM 58, the Beta 58 is more responsive in mids and especially in
heights...you will get feedback, feedback, feedback...
=20
=20
Blues & Gru=DF
"busy" Tom Deimbacher
Vienna Blues Connection
www.blues.at
+43.676.9614711
(this mail and all possible attachements have been checked against =
viruses)=20
- -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag =
von
Mike and Beverly Rogers
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juli 2004 00:44
An: harp-l
Betreff: SM 58 Question
I have been singing and playing through the same Shure 58 for years, =
when
accompanying acoustic instruments. My question is: has anyone done a
comparison between the regular 58 and the Beta 58, when it comes to the
harp. Seems like the Beta is more sensitive, and takes less volume =
control
setting through the P.A. Thanks for any imput. Bullfrog
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.