Re: overblows, was Same Old Thing
- Subject: Re: overblows, was Same Old Thing
- From: Gatorharp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:44:35 EDT
alec@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< When I first stated listening to these guys I thought that a lot of their
overblows stood out. In many cases, the music was so complex, that I never
bothered to try to figure out what they were playing. Once I finally got
around to figuring some of it out, though, I discovered that, in most cases,
it was actually the regular bends that were sticking out more than the
overblows. This takes us back to the "Ode to Joy" challenge, which I thought
demonstrated pretty well how hard it is (impossible?) to bend a note to the
proper pitch and maintain consistent tone and timber.
Anyone else agree? Put in a CD of your favorite overblow player, figure out
what harp they are using and then pick out a handful of the notes that stick
out. My guess is that you'll find that more often than not, those notes are
"regular bends" and not overblows. >>
i alluded to this...wish i had remembered the "ode to joy" challenge. but
yeah, "normal" bends, by even the best harp players still sound different than
non-bent notes. we are conditioned to think these are okay, because they've
been with us for so long.
steven j gatorman
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.