Re: Stigma of the Harmonica
- Subject: Re: Stigma of the Harmonica
- From: Gatorharp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:57:31 EDT
keith richards (and others) have referred to guitars as pieces of wood with
wires hanging on them...or words to that effect. to my knowledge, no
guitarists got all excited about whether he was denigrating the guitar.
here, if someone says (innocently, at that) that it's just metal and plastic,
or refers to it as "our humble little instrument", it's like heresy.
i like the adam gussow approach. love your harp. but it's just a harp. if
i were to go by some of what's said here, i would think that no other
instrument could possibly surpass the harp. the harp ~is~ very expressive. it is
not, factually, ~the~ most expressive instrument. it may be to you, but that's a
personal preference.
i agree with g that if respect for the harp and your own harp playing are
what you're after, then learning all you can about music in general is the way to
go. you can't worry about every smacked-ass who just wants to wail. the
best you can do is represent yourself well.
iceman talked about the newspeople who look for the gimmicky players, as
opposed to great players. sad indeed. i'm surprised, really, that anyone would
still remember vaudevillian antics...meaning that most of the current
newspeople are too young to have grown up around it. but the other reality is that
there are no ~real~ harp players working in absolutely popular music. the
closest we've come in the last ten years was john popper, and he got derided in the
harp community, in part, for what he wasn't. the great harp players of today
are working in genres that aren't going to generate a lot of attention...until
some harp player decides to reach out to a mass audience, i think it's likely
to remain that way (and before you mention stevie wonder, remember that in
the real world, his harmonica playing is about the fourth or fifth thing for
which he's known...although i agree he would be an ideal ambassador).
music today is, more than ever, centered on guitars or electronic keyboards.
you don't hear lots of sax, flute, etc either. whether people want to hear
harp (or sax, or flute), i don't know, but they certainly aren't clamoring for
it.
amazingly, many harp players seem okay with part of that. i've seen many
here say the hell with fake pop crap, they'd rather play their real music.
mention the handful of hip-hop tracks with harp (and there are actually quite a
few), and then duck.
i'm rambling at this point, i guess.
during my lifetime, in the music that matters most to me (rock&roll, country,
blues, r&b, soul, pop), the harp has always been a bonafide instrument. i
don't think i've ever encountered disrespect for the ~instrument~...i've met
folks who have had bad experiences with harp players who want to wail and emote,
and while it makes my immediate circumstances tougher, all i can do is soldier
on, give them the opposite of what they were expecting. i have also met
folks who thought it was easy to play...these people always play a little harp,
they let you know. i'm no great shake harp player, but i'm solid, and these
semi-harp players usually let me know that i'm a lot better than they are after
they hear me.
still rambling, with no conclusion in sight, so i'll end here...
steven j gatorman
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.