Re: 12th position = 1st Flat Position
- Subject: Re: 12th position = 1st Flat Position
- From: IcemanLE@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:31:09 EDT
In a message dated 6/12/03 5:44:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> Here we do have a strong potential for real musical confusion, for
> the reasons that I detailed previously. I say this with some regret
> because the "x flat" terminology is convenient and therefore
> appealing.
>
It seems the word "Flat" is the problem. Instead of tying it into specific
musical notation (ie, the key of "F" has one flatted note in it), use this term
to point in the direction of a Cycle of Fourths as opposed to the Cycle of
Fifths.
Starting from "C", each succeeding cycle of fifth adds one "Sharp" to the key
signature. Harmonicaspeak has already labelled this "x Position" instead of
"x Sharp Position".
Going in the opposite direction (Cycle of Fourths) adds one "Flat" to the key
signature for each succeeding cycle, so "x Flat Position" could be the term
used to indicate the cycle of fourths.
Perhaps we can make up a new word indicating this direction that doesn't
contain a reference to existing musical notation/key signature/ etc.
The Iceman
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.