Re: overblows, was Same Old Thing
- Subject: Re: overblows, was Same Old Thing
- From: Gatorharp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:04:23 EDT
ironmancurtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< However, I don't like when I'm forced to use a timbre that I may not want
because the instrument is limited - or worse (and how I tend to reason),
because my own technique is lacking. I think it's a fine goal to TRY to make all
of our notes sound as even as we possibly can, and with all the different
timbres we can muster. I spend a lot of time working on making all my notes sound
as alike as I can get them. My goal is to get my valved diatonic to sound as
seamless as a well played chromatic. >>
levy addressed this...he said that one goal was to be able to play every note
as similar to all the other notes as possible, with as little coloration as
possible. he also pointed out that overbends (and traditional bends) ~do~
sound different from unbent notes, and you should also strive to be able exploit
these differences.
the goal is to control the technique, not have the technique control you.
easier typed that done.
steven j gatorman
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.