re:tone (re:amp/tone)
- Subject: re:tone (re:amp/tone)
- From: dave rudolph <drcurly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 02:55:06 -0800
In response to a portion of Robb Bingham's <robbingham@xxxxxxxxx>
fine post: I would say that amp tone has been dissed through the prior
months. I apologize for not clarifying this. This is why I prefer the
life of a lurker. Prior to this thread I had become used to being a
disappointed lurker when ever someone was asking for amplifier
information pertaining to the harmonica. Rob, my complaint proceeds
this thread.
me: <With this said I would like to add that it seems
<a great waste of an important subject to
<continually dismiss the questions of
<amp tone with the the "great tone is developed
<through Ö" dialogue that has become so
<redundant on this list.
- - ---
Rob: No one dismissed amp tone before you brought it up-
though it is another flame-magnet subject
Subject: Tone
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.