Re: tone and walter horton
- Subject: Re: tone and walter horton
- From: the Leones <leone@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:12:20 +0100
>In a message dated 1/20/03 2:09:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>Vadimonium@xxxxxxx writes:
>hi, it's a long and interesting - although somewhat pointed at times...ha!
>- discussion re: tone. i'm just wondering if i'm the only person on the
>planet who likes walter horton for other demensions to his playing in
>addition to his tone? so often when his name is mentioned discussion
>centers on his tone; but, man, i love his phrasing, his choice of notes,
>and the feelings i get when i listen closely to his music. the set of
>licks in tom ball's book re: little walter and walter horton is a master
>class in so many other things about horton's playing than tone only.
>his stuff is, to my ear, multi-demensional and deserves recognition for
>that, too. i rarely hear his name brought up about anything other than
>his tone, and, to me, that's a shame. he brought ever more to the blues
>and the harp. thanks, ===================================== Que se puede
>hacer -- Vadie...
>
It's all Mojo-Red's fault. At the end of all his messages he has a statement
the first thing you think about is his tone..that big, fat, tone. So what
I think happened is that everyone reads it and just stops
there.........(kidding)...smo-joe
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.