<< The facts are that tone can indeed be defined and quantified, and it's very
much to our benefit to define and quantify it. Otherwise we can never
achieve good tone. For example, how does one master resonance without
defining it first? There is NOTHING that is done on harmonica that cannot
be defined. The fact that some folks can't define it in no way means that
it cannot be done. Only that it HASN'T been. >>
so, is anyone gonna define "tone"? and after that, how about defining "good
tone" and "bad tone"? not examples, but a straight forward definition, "good
tone is done this way..."
larry's post tells us how to improve our tone, but only if we accept that as
an objective definition of good tone...
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and