Re[2]: Tone
- Subject: Re[2]: Tone
- From: Ron/datadigr <rdg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 12:11:47 -0500
Hello Robb,
re what you wrote below...
Understood. Appreciated. Sir.
Ron
Sunday, January 19, 2003, 2:00:24 PM, you wrote:
RB> PS: Ron, your comments are fine, I wasn't thinking of
RB> you in any of my above comments. I just think if I
RB> made my suggestions for ~Objective Tone Criteria~ this
RB> forum would attack semantical, philosophical and
RB> psuedo-political aspects [~No one is EVER allowed to
RB> call ANYTHING good or bad~ ~be yourself~, ~let's all
RB> get along and ~Stop picking on the guy with bad tone~,
RB> bla bla bla]. This list is the best- but it's always
RB> been like that.
RB> Happy to discuss ideas for defining ~Tone~ after it
RB> calms down. Or offlist.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.