Re: harp-l-digest V10 #84

[John Frazer <harmonicajohns@xxxxxxx>]

I like Vern's idea. Until the test, how about you folks with strong opinions
shut up about "that which can not be proven" and give us all a major break.
This "debate" was worn out a couple of years ago. If you want to read about
it search under materials debate or re: materials debate. You should get
some hits. Please drop the thread. JR Ross is already prepared to leave the
list. I bet there are others. Those of you that care, please refrain from
posting any more semantic "I'm so clever" arguments. There, I begged.

hj

- -- 

Watch out! He has some kind of an instrument that lets out a death sound!
Harmonica John Frazer  PO Box 740613  San Diego, CA 92174 ph.(619)263-6826

www.harmonicajohn.com
please listen to the music clips on my website and send your comments.

> 
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:28:25 -0800
> From: "Vern Smith" <jevern@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Comb Material [revisited]
> 
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: <vince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> I will testify that we had
>> 3 people in that room the other night and we ALL could tell there was a
>> difference (though the only thing different on each harp was the comb)! I
> am
>> not an engineer but I have ears.
> 
> I am an engineer but my ears hear no differences attributable to materials!
> 
> If you are able to demonstrate that in public by blindfolded listening to
> the harps, then you should accept my wager and win $1000!  Put together a
> 3-way $1000 pool and all three of you can try.  If any one of you wins, I'll
> pay him the $1000.  If more than one wins, you can split it.  Of course if
> no one can do it, you pay me $1000.   I can't be fairer than that!
> 
> Vern    ;o)