Re: Comb Material [revisited]
- Subject: Re: Comb Material [revisited]
- From: the Leones <leone@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:45:12 +0100
Well, it looks like Gatorharp & Datadigger win a "Prize" cookie.
Yes, I WAS springing a trap! I purposefully worded MY sentences in a way
that I could change the one FROM "there is NO difference" TO "they sound
the same", thereby changing the NEGATIVE statement to a POSITIVE.
Since it has been decreed that "Onus" is on the positive, THINGS HAVE
TURNED AROUND. How does it feel?
Gator & Data just reinforced my statement AND renewed my faith in mankind,
This is no surprise to me as I have ALWAYS considered them to be "Brainy"
>Monday, February 03, 2003, 7:54:45 PM, you wrote:
>Gac> does "they sound the same" count as a positive statement?
>Phrased that way, the onus would be on the person who said they
>sounded the same.
>The person who said they don't could sit back and wait for the proof.
>I'm not posting an opinion on whether they sound different or the
>same, since I think any diffference possible would be overshadowed by
>technique and amplification but that's just my opinion. I'm far more
>concerned with longevity, tuning and action/playability.
>I like the _weight_ of an aluminum comb, for instance, if that's what
>the Promasters have.
>Harp-l is sponsored by SPAH.
>Hosted by ValuePricehosting.com, www.valuepricehosting.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and