Fwd: Re: conventions
- Subject: Fwd: Re: conventions
- From: the Leones <leone@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:07:47 -0500
>> > > > > Hi all;
>>> >> > I was wondering if anyone has any Ideas on which
>>> >> entertainers to have at the
>>> >> > Buckeye or SPAH conventions. It would be fun to
>>> >> read your comments.
>>> > > > Ý Ý buzz..........
>>>
>>>
>> > Don't spend a lot of money bringing in "Big" names. They aren't
>>> that good. Lesser players (who are 96.3% as good), should suffice and
>>> be a lot less expensive. There are a ton of good players out there.
>>> Maybe not "Stars", but still quite good.
>>>
>> > smo-joe
>
>
> I know this sounds like I'm opening ANOTHER Pandora's Box issue,
>but having been to quite a few of these, AND since I am not a *Star*
>(read-VERY busy), I have had time to notice things. For the first 10
>yrs or so, I just attended and didn't make any ripples.
>
> It is astronomically difficult (from a logistics standpoint) to
>schedule a show for EITHER Buckeye OR SPAH, because they are
>relatively big gatherings (avg 360 attendees).
>
> There are a lot of DEDICATED players who are willing to give of
>themselves at either reduced rates, freebies, extended services,
>taking "Comps" in lieu of a fee, that bringing in people at great
>expense is just not practical.
>
> I also understand that the fest organizers have to come up with
>people who are a "Draw". Well, since the conventions hardly have
>more than 360 attending, where's the draw? Why don't more people
>attend? Is it the "Line-up". Is it the price?. Dunno...
>
> I don't believe these fests come away with much of a profit in the
>first place, and if a performer doesn't want to do it as part of the
>"Big Picture", that's their business. I can certainly understand
>that some people are professionals and this stuff is their living. A
>couple days a year, however, shouldn't cause starvation.
>
> Example: Fata Morgana is the first OVERSEAS group in years that I
>thought was worth while. Others were either Too expensive OR
>"Ho-Hum".
>
> We have one of the best trios in the world right here in the U.S.
>What about the "McKelvey Trio"? As far as diversification, I have
>heard countless times that the "Bluesers" are taking over. This
>usually from older chromatic players who want to hear MORE chromatic
>and LESS diatonic.
>
> The problem here is that these older chromatic players are coming
>to the conventions year after year and DON't eventually raise up to
>the status of "Show Performer". This is not true of the Diatonic
>players. These guys progress and eventually (after a few yrs) are
>the people up there entertaining us. Example: Allen R. Holmes
>
> The "Ensemble" playing is gradually going OUT, and "Singletons"
>(Chromatic) are taking their place(s). The problem HERE is that a
>singleton needs BACKUP. How does one get this elusive backup? You
>either bring your own OR depend on the Carol Beth crew to help you
>out.
>
> Unless you're a "Big Gun" like Rob Paparrozzi (is HE good or
>what), Mike Turk, Will Galison, you AIN't gonna get this backup.
>It's not financially feasible.
>
> If you're a Diatonic player, you could probably get by with just a guitar.
>
> At the Buckeye (2002), I had occasion to witness almost ALL the
>older audience members walk out on Lee Oskar's show. Upon
>questioning this behavior, I got; "I can't stay up that late",
>YEAH-RIGHT. It was disconcerting to say the least. The wife and I
>(BOTH 61) stayed and enjoyed. I felt bad for Lee. I mean REAL bad.
>
> BTW, "Before the Rain" of poison darts, I should admit that I used
>to play 55% Diatonic & 45% Chromatic. Now it is about switched
>around. I played an evening show SPAH 2002. 2 Chromatic numbers/2
>Diatonic. So I am NOT BIASED in any way shape or form.
>
> We have a lot of talent out there. We ought to send them an
>"Invite" and see what they say.
>
> Just MY 34 Lire.....smo-joe
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.