Re: Defining blues
I often go private email in response to questions about often asked
questions (OAQ's) because I have gotten gun shy from a time when I was
involved in fairly technical discussion regarding the capacitor value of
optimum sonic qualities for the JT-30/ Blues Blaster microphone. "Why
don't we just call this AMP-L" was the line I remeber. When I do respond
privately to an enquiry I often include the information that a more
detailed discussion on the question being asked is also available through
an indexed search of the archives. Somewhat akin to what a good
reference librarian does when you ask what Napoleon's birthday is.
He/she tells you the answer then refers you to more extensive information
on the subject. There are a lot of new people on this list lately.
Perhaps they don't realize that there is a core group of individuals on
the list that have been here for years not weeks and perrhaps this core
has seen the answer to how to do a number 2 draw bend on more than one
occassion. Not that this is a bad thing and that nothing should ever be
discussed more than once. A desire to put off and or arrogance is not
the overriding concern when most people mention the existence of archival
material. The long time listers are a valuable resource to the entire
list and part of their value is their ability to refer people to good
threads contained in the archives. If you, Thomas Hinkle find this
offensive I apologize. It is certainly not my intent to offend. In the
same vein I often send answers to questions out into the net and never
receive acknowledgement of their receipt or worth. I also tend to send
abbreviated answers because it's difficult to guage what is an
appropriate answer and how much information the person wanted. In
pursuing my own personal questions privately I have found others on the
list to be quite forthcoming in their private answers and their
wiilingness to share information. Finally the newcomers to the list have
to realize that this isn't like blues-l or some of the other more chatty
lists and newsgroups. In the past the discussions although sometimes
less frequent than on other lists have tended to be more substantative. FJM
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.