Re: Mosaic Vs NetScape

[haandruss@xxxxxxx (Harvey Andruss)]

At  8:42 AM 2/3/95 +0000, G JACKSON wrote:

>Its easy to get fed up waiting for Mosaic to load something for you, only to
>find it can not access the graphics at the end of it! {sigh}
>
>Its FAR worse with Nescape.
>
>b) Re: Mosaic not being updated. There is a 32 bit version of Mosaic, which
>is much better. The feeling at work here, among our computer buffs, is
>that it does not need to be updated anyway.	

FWIW, I have used both recently on an 030 33 MHz MAC-Duo 230 and
suprisingly find the exact opposite conclusion. Both in 32 bit mode.  My
version of Mosaic can access graphics also (200A8.68k). Are you a Windows
user?

Also, to add to the playful noise level on ~guitar tuning~, locking tremolo
bridges and locking tuners exist so retuning is needed much less often on
certain models, especially for aggressive players.  Also, there are devices
that allow one to change ~relative tuning~ of the strings, eg. from the
normal EADGBE to DADGAD or some such popular ~open tuning~.

Might it be possible to extend the same ~idea~  to the ~Slide Harp~
concept, with one set of reeds tuned ~Richter~ and another to one of the
~Beauregard~ tunings ?

Harv <HAAndruss@xxxxxxx> -- opinions my own