error-riddled FAQ

[haandruss@xxxxxxx (Harvey A. Andruss, III15)]

Sorry Winslow/Rick-- I just read his topics when I posted. It does
basically suck :(  I pulled it off the gopher when I searched FAQ.  Agree
misinformation is worse than no information,  however the downside of even
constructive criticism is that it may make potential contributers think
twice about submitting (intimidation factor).  Where I come from, a not
atypical outcome of raising an issue is to get it assigned to you.  Looks
like your 'it' Winslow :) :)   Seriously, any time you (or anybody else)
can spend would be greatly appreciated. Posting an interim FAQ on the
gopher is still a good idea. Enough bandwidth on this.

I received the 'always has been' Magic Salwitz/Beauregard patent today.  35
figures (each with slightly different tuning), 40 paragraphs.  I'll post
parts when I have time.

I have keyed in some Richter tuning diagrams that I'll post if anyone's
interested (ascii text), eg. it lays out the b3 (min3), the #4/b5 and b7
(dom 7) as useful overblow notes in first position blues (holes 1 and 4, 5
and 6 resp); and the b6(min6), 7 (maj7), and b3 (min3) similarly for second
position (and on through all 12 positions, incl. the overdraws and other
notes).  May be appendable to Winslows excellent position discussion a
month or so ago (the one with the circle of 5ths :)    Get busy out there.