Re: [Harp-L] Re: Harp players gear lists? blah blah longish

"And that brings us to the bigger issue: the implication in this post that pro harp players are shills for gear makers."

Actually, the implication, somewhat said in jest (I apologize if anyone was offended) was that 'some' players who accept sponsorship from a specific company, over others, 'may' have signed a deal to that effect, perhaps an exclusionary deal, that would preclude any further transparent objectivity in their promotions of this or that brand of harp, since they are, in fact, representing that company.

I mean, to be reasonable, I would assume that someone who represents company "A" fairly frequently and publicly, would not want to be quoted stating that company "B" makes a better harp. That would put his/her sponsorship at risk, would it not? Unless, of course, company "B" proffers a better offer to said artist, and a shift is made, professionally, by said artist.

I would hope, as you professed or seemed to imply, that ALL harp players were so genuine (and my suspicions are more often along this line than not) as to not allow their financial allegiances or responsibilities alter their honest opinions in terms of what they feel about this or that harp. You CAN see, if you stay long enough, that certain players represent certain companies, seemingly by contract of some sort, as every time a particular company is mentioned, they speak up as that company's rep. It's no big secret.

Then, not having personal, familiar knowledge of said representative, one may not know(public assurances of non-bias notwithstanding) whether the advices given by this or that one may be as reliable as that given by one who is not held by or affected by a contract with such-and-such company.

So, having a list of what equipment is actually owned and used is often useful, in case one wishes to get past any potential rhetoric.

There is a difference between passion and promotion. Not being entirely familiar with any of the principle subjects involved, one may, if one is new here, assume that every opinion is a passion, and not merely promotion for the sake of pecuniary gain, while the reverse may at times be the case, again, regardless of assurances otherwise.

Who knows what evil lurks in the heart of man,,,,the Shadow knows.

Kidding.

But truly, my primary motivation was not to expose any such inconsistencies, but to help enlighten any future choices, mainly from a personal perspective.

Thanks, and again, my apologies, if I stepped on any toes unintended.

Robert, stickler for the truth.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hunter" <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 5:58 AM
Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Harp players gear lists? blah blah longish


Robert Laughlin wrote:

I wonder if anyone has ever gone to the trouble of compiling a list of the
various preferred gear collection of working or non-working harpists?

It would be nice to compare, at a glance, who uses which harps, how many
artists use customized vs stock harps. Which artists are company
shills,,er,,I mean, sponsored by a particular company,,hehe.

I mean, realistically, at least here on harp-l, it seems that several of
the members are also reps for particular companies, so one has to take that
into account when deciding on whose advice to take, in making brand or
model choices.


At one time I ran a feature on my site called the Pro Pages, which (among other things) listed the gear choices of prominent players. You can see what ran on those pages here:
http://www.hunterharp.com/propage1/

As you'll see on those pages, pros, like everybody else, use a wide range of gear. At this point in time, harmonica players are interested in lots of different musical styles, and gear choices have never been more numerous, less expensive, or of higher quality, so it's no surprise that if you sample three pros, you'll find more than three different setups.

And that brings us to the bigger issue: the implication in this post that pro harp players are shills for gear makers. The short answer to that implication is that it's all wrong. When a pro harp player recommends a harp or an amp, it's not at all the same as J Lo appearing in a cosmetics ad. J Lo doesn't have to rely on those cosmetics to get her through a performance; the harp player does. If a piece of gear isn't effective, a pro won't keep using it. When the pro discovers something that works better for him, he'll switch. The switch is very rarely about which manufacturer is dangling the best deal; it's about what gear is inspiring the pro to great performances. Pros who have a lot of intellectual curiosity, like Charlie Musselwhite, tend to try lots of different gear over the years. Why not? When the gear is getting better all the time, you might as well try it.

FYI, I make my own gear choices pretty plain on my site, and I am not sponsored by anyone. Every piece of gear I use on stage and in studio was purchased with my own money. I use the stuff because it inspires me, and I make the Digitech RP sounds I developed for my own use available to others in the hope that those sounds will inspire them too.

In the end, regardless of what a given pro is using, the gear you want is the gear that makes a sound that inspires you, whatever that sound is.

Regards, Richard Hunter









author, "Jazz Harp" (Oak Publications, NYC)
Latest mp3s and harmonica blog at http://hunterharp.com
Vids at http://www.youtube.com/user/lightninrick
Twitter: lightninrick 


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.