Re: [Harp-L] micing amp
- To: "Cljdm@xxxxxxx" <Cljdm@xxxxxxx>, "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] micing amp
- From: Mojo Red <harplicks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:24:19 -0800 (PST)
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1330741459; bh=3FMD8Gnf09r+0dGmSLwdL8hxj7CjlxJQL7hSiPitTU4=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BbO1VBZaJFHyrkLlo3YwWt+faJ6MOp1WqfQDZLl/nOBtNycgRsN5fnYO5UScEC68vRQeYB6L/PXACqESVqNYzg6qZxXCucZzyEOr3ogSm5U+YHDx5KnKytABaDs8TppK8HXMPVUvwuwIa1xeWn4julcWTZzPYFzpDHfQZnET+3E=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ssxdPHLHLYUsVDfBo4eoLZCw8DsgzGpxaGLIRa0WQOnrQrBhalLIBctsCsEE41fzH93sRp61HeJe3r12xYJXp/VfluDuRF+qh3rrZEQzhRu1TOlXEdC5YSgh059uZo4ENjJvbOWcvoHNPF3S1fd8sP5iPCgI8PXEq9KHxZ45D2g=;
- In-reply-to: <104af.2ca87c26.3c825edc@aol.com>
- References: <104af.2ca87c26.3c825edc@aol.com>
- Reply-to: Mojo Red <harplicks@xxxxxxxxx>
I'd definitively go with the SM 57. Less feedback. Point it directly at the amp, don't hang over the front.
Harpin' in Colo.
--Ken M.
________________________________
From: "Cljdm@xxxxxxx" <Cljdm@xxxxxxx>
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 10:35 AM
Subject: [Harp-L] micing amp
Hi,
What would be the better mic for micing a four speaker amp through a PA?
A Shure SM 57 or a SM 58 ?
Thanks,
Chris Mastakas
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.