RE: [Harp-L] Re: Harp-L Digest, Vol 94, Issue 29



I agree with Richard. And here in Nashville, I am noticing that the guitar players seem to be gravitating towards a pedal board with all their favorite classic pedals. But that's the guitar players. I see this as a trend, yes, but I have a Zoom multi FX console which is similar to the RP355s and am getting good results with it. However, I do not use a lot of effects unless there is reason for that 'special' thing. Of course the Zooms and RPs come programmed for guitar and you have to learn to modify the patches to accommodate harp. The programming was a bit intimidating at first but once I got used to the little tricks it is no big deal to program a patch for harp. Or with the RPs, you can buy a patch from Richard. Oh, and the Zoom came with a copy of Cubase and has a USB interface and is quite handy in the studio. It also has two channels each with a 12ax7.
 
Good luck with the pedals. I mean that. Lately I have seen and heard some pedal boards to die for!
 
Buck
 

> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:50:39 -0400
> From: turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Harp-L Digest, Vol 94, Issue 29
> 
> Leonardo Cozendey Crespo <cozendey@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >I want a pedal train with the following pedals
> >
> >Harp Delay
> >Harp Octave
> >Harp Attack
> >Tone+
> >Boss DD-3
> >Micro POG
> >Line Rotomachine
> >
> >This is the sequence i have elected as the best:
> >
> >Mic
> >A/B Box (as an on/off switch)
> >Harp Delay (always on delay)
> >Harp octave
> >Effect loop pedal
> >Loop 1 - Micro POG -> Line 6 Rotomachine
> >Loop 2 - Boss DD-3 (looooooong delay)
> >Tone+
> >Harp Attack
> >DI Box
> >Amp or PA
> >
> >With this setup I can play with PA (harp attack and DI at the end), guitar amps (Tone+ at the end) and my harp amp (harp delay mostly)
> >
> >The quation are:
> >1. Is the sequence too long? I didn't noticed tone sucking and the tone's being great but, i'd like to have your impressions.
> >2. Any other sugestions for sequence? 
> >3. Does any of you have any expering with a pedal train like this or quite like this?
> >
> >Any comments are great.
> >
> 
> The first thing I did was total up the estimated price for this gear:
> A/B Box (as an on/off switch) $ 40
> Harp Delay (always on delay) $125 
> Harp octave $125
> Effect loop pedal $100
> Loop 1 - Micro POG -> Line 6 Rotomachine $200+$200
> Loop 2 - Boss DD-3 (looooooong delay) $100
> Tone+ $125
> Harp Attack $125
> DI Box $ 80
> ----
> 1220
> 
> Not extremely high, though several hundred dollars higher than doing something similar with amp modelers and other multi-fx (three RP355s on the floor would run less than $600 and would include between them most of the FX listed above). The harp attack pedal is a good addition to the kit--without it a hefty tube amp would be needed. You wouldn't need the harp attack with an amp modeler pedal, since they serve the same function. 
> 
> The second thing that strikes me is that there are no modulation FX in this kit--no flange, no chorus, no phase shifter, no auto-wah. Relatively few harp players use these FX, which is either a warning or an opportunity depending on your point of view. It's more surprising that there's no reverb in the kit, though you've got two delays, and my guess is that the one that's always on is doing slapback. 
> 
> I don't see any reason why this setup wouldn't sound good. You might need to add a noise gate at some point, but it's all quality gear that makes good sounds, and all the sounds are good for harp. 
> 
> Regards, Richard Hunter
> 
> author, "Jazz Harp" 
> latest mp3s and harmonica blog at http://hunterharp.com
> Myspace http://myspace.com/richardhunterharp
> Vids at http://www.youtube.com/user/lightninrick
> more mp3s at http://taxi.com/rhunter
> Twitter: lightninrick
 		 	   		  


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.