Re: [Harp-L] Hohner Quality

To: harp-l <Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Hohner Quality
From: JohnnieHarp <johnnieharp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:38:29 -0700
Cc:
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ihv4pfnUrFUCyViA1e6/hOKxGfa0i8xpBhJ45UaankM=; b=Mo1AC2Mazy0/U2TgYltH4akhUp3MvpWyx//b8HoRstzUVf56952H4w0TvsoucnPIIK n+oKxUqidhLHa3j0uwydGiXAq4da5uUFZQ3tMRFMzEou9WxepHUYmgS+LnmeayjlAFgU Wbe6Q373DpB0Zkf3ugLtVNTRQ+OleCI5KCsuY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=YFn9DbL/sLiD6L4wEsj3H//Jp48YIR9KBSnXLtyPi8wfp6sQLBj0mA+t19WRw8Lhj/ LikNn3pHtg3XHUI42Wu7WrcONQLbjQfEx6qPUf81LmE638CVtXwPT5aSLyYb1Z5xf5ZI fRTx4LJOe8DcAhDmcjowv7+RQULk0T3PX2JSM=

>Anyone else noticed an improvement lately?


Which Hohner models are you referring to?

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.