Seriously, where is it written that a new player cannot learn good "chops" and good habits while dabbling with amped tone? My experience with students is contrary to that.
And more importantly, when does the new player get permission to start using an amp? Some Harp-Lers imply that the amp should come after the player has accomplished good acoustic tone, but what the heck does that mean? I can't think of anything more arbitrary and subjective.
If a player aspires toward entertaining one day, he'll likely have to deal with amplification -- and the techniques and challenges that presents. If he wants to be a Chicago Blues guy, he will certainly need to develop some mic skills. Even a bluegrass or Irish player will need to someday step up to a mic and do his thing. It takes practice to sound good though a mic, be that a vocal mic on a stand or a bullet mic in your hand.
The students I take on are all Blues players who want the nasty amped tone. They know what it sounds like, and it is rewarding hearing them progress. Some sound amazing after a relatively short time. Every student has his own path. It seems wrong-headed for us to demand that all blues harp students play only acoustic music. Do we make the same demand of guitar students?
Again, I mean no disrepect for any Harp-Ler who may disagree. I see the wisdom in your point of view. But I wish I had gotten involved with amps sooner than I did, since the close-mic'ed amped sound is what I always loved.
-Rick Davis
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:51 AM, <IcemanLE@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps it is just that this is a lot to bite off and chew for a beginner - not saying that everyone would be overwhelmed or diluted in the effort. I don't believe anyone suggested the beginner would be ruined.
In a message dated 1/9/2009 8:59:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, bluesharpamps@xxxxxxxxx writes:
I respectfully disagree with the many Harp-Lers who (as I predicted) feel certain that a beginning blues player should not buy an amp.
Amps do not cover up bad playing; they expose it brutally. Bad playing sounds, well, bad when played acoustically, but it sounds truly wretched when played through an amp. Amps encourage better technique.
Nowhere did I suggest a new blues player should practice ONLY with a mic and amp; that would be silly. But it is equally silly to suggest a new player will be somehow ruined by buying a small tube practice amp and working with it occasionally.
As some on this thread have said, amplified playing is a skill unto itself, quite apart from the basics of the harmonica. If a new player is drawn to the sound he hears from players such as Kim Wilson or Big Walter, by all means he should get a small tube amp and work on the technique. He certainly won't sound like Big Walter right away, but neither will the beginning acoustic player sound like Howard Levy right away. It takes practice. And it takes practice to sound good with an amp, too. The beginning player might as well get started sooner rather than later, if that is the sound to which he aspires.
-Rick Davis _______________________________________________ Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ( http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De cemailfooterNO62) _______________________________________________ Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1885 - Release Date: 1/9/2009 7:59 PM