Re:Subject: [Harp-L] Digitech Vx400 users aboard?




On Jun 11, 2006, at 4:44 AM, Ludo Beckers wrote:


Thanks Randy, I knew I had seen a review somewhere before.

<< 4 or 5 distortion settings that my Vx 400 unit has are sufficient for me, especially with my Turner/Sure mike (designed by dennis-mr microphone) <<

I haven't found any yet, but then again, my bullet mike isn't equipped with XLR.
I DO BELIEVE YOU CAN GET AN ADAPTER FOR THIS. YOU HAVE TO TRY THE BULLET WITH THIS UNIT, IT IS AMAZING. try the bullet mike with a clean setting, not necessarily with one of the distortion settings, experiment.

I find it a pity there's no jack input for a mike.
So far I've only tried it with an SM57.
LOOK MORE CAREFULLY, I BELIEVE BOTH MODELS ( 300 AND 400 ) have both quarter inch and xlr inputs
<< up to 7 effects at once <<

You wrote that about the 300 model - very unfortunate (and strange for an upgraded model?) that there's only one effect at a time with the vx400.
INCORRECT,--------- I CAN STACK MULTIPLE EFFECTS WITH THE 400

<<The only drawbacks that I can find is that the bypass switch is placed too close to the expression pedal...be careful not to hit it accidently. <<


Exactly what happened to me too, and my feet really ain't too big :-)
THE KEY TO THIS IS TO MAKE SURE THE DESIGNED PRESETS ARE NOT SOFTER THAN THE BYPASS VOLUME. -- so that if you accidentally hit the bypass, it will not be louder (in the bypass mode) and thereby cause feedback.

<< I found excellent results just turning up the input knob and overdriving the preamp of the unit. So, when you play soft, the sound is clear. When you blow it harder, it distorts accordingly and naturally. <<


I'll try that, thanks.

<< new model out called the VX400. <<, mike modeling (even a green bullet setting),<<
Which, so far at least, I don't find convincing at all.
I AGREE, BUT TRY IT WITH A GREEN BULLET OR SIMILAR MIKE

<


<< This is the unit I use now. It is much better and has some handy output controls on the front panel that the 300 lacks. <<

Out of the box there's one patch I really like, which is with the doubler on.
I experimented at home to make new patches taking this one as a starting point and got some ok-sounds.
When I got to the rehearsal room though, they all had different volumes, from screaming to whisper.
I'm not really electronically talented and will need a lot of time to work this out.
Luckily I have the machine in loan from a shop owner who's in a band I play with.
CALL ME ON THE FONE ONDAY, I WILL READ SOME OF MY PRESETS TO YOU.

In fact, what I was really looking for originally is a machine with intelligent polyphony settings.
Digitech had one that's now out of production.
One other brand (forgot the name) was way over my budget.


I'm still in dubio whether to simply go for a 2nd hand POD or stick with this vx400.
YOU MAY FIND THE POD DOES NOT GET CLEAN ENOUGH.
I SWITCH MIKES FOR BEST RESULTS. FOR CLEAN, MY AUDIX, FOR DIRTY, MY CUSTOM TURNER/SURE MIKE
With the first it's easy to get a Chicago sound, with the second, as you say, the clean sound can be really great.
I'll keep experimenting.


Ludo







This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.