Re: Re: [Harp-L] Required Reading --- A Love Supreme



What I said was: "the discussion of style versus technique is very similar." We can substitute Levy if you like. Much of his work has a similar effect on me.

-tim

Tim Moyer
Working Man's Harps
http://www.workingmansharps.com/

At 09:56 PM 4/19/2006, Chris Michalek wrote:
Popper is in no way like 'Trane. Howard Levy is very much like Coltrane. I'm even seeing parallels between both musician's later periods.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim Moyer [mailto:wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 07:28 PM
>To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Re: [Harp-L] Required Reading --- A Love Supreme
>
>The Boss wrote:
>> I guess my question is how does any of this serve the needs
>> of the thread? It seemed to me this list of lists got started
>> so people could share their personal thoughts about music
>> that had some sort of profound effect on them. I don't know
>> that I'd ever feel comfortable criticising anyone's choices in
>> music. If what you want is for people to not take risks in
>> posting this is a great way to get there. I was finding it
>> very interesting to read about the music that people were
>> effected by. I'm hoping this is just a minor blip in the road
>> and this whole discussion rights itself and continues in the
>> previously personal and fascinating way it began.
>
>As much as I recognize the indelicacy of the comments regarding
>someone's choice of a particular recording as being influential
>(how's that for diplomatically vague?), I think there is some
>validity in discussing that choice. If we leave out the personality
>issues, I find the discussion of Coltrane's work pretty
>interesting.
>
>I've personally long been conflicted about Coltrane. I respect his
>abilities, and in some contexts I've heard him shine, but many times
>he leaves me exhausted and confused. I love his work with Monk, who
>I think provided him a delightfully playful structure in which to
>flex his considerable muscle. Likewise, I think he was sometimes a
>wonderfully energetic counterpoint to Miles Davis.
>
>I realize this is a stretch in a harmonica forum, but we might make
>comparisons between the debate over Coltrane's style and that of a
>certain harmonica player who's name shall not be mentioned. Mind
>you, I'm not saying those two are in any way similar as far as their
>impact on music as a whole, but the discussion of style versus
>technique is very similar.
>
>Maybe if we can leave out the profanity and the assumptions about
>people tastes we can actually find some value in this offshoot of
>the thread.
>
>-tim
>
>Tim Moyer
>Working Man's Harps
>http://www.workingmansharps.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
>Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>






This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.